Oncor Brings Smart Grid to 3 Million Texans, Privacy Intact

Pathway to Power Graphic via Oncor

The smart grid, a digital technology that gives consumers and electric companies detailed consumption data, is undergoing widespread deployment in much of Texas.

Oncor, the largest electric distribution and transmission service in the state, has been replacing mechanical meters with digital smart meters since 2008, with plans to deploy more than 3 million by 2012.

The technology will forever alter how consumers receive and learn about their electricity. Where before consumers received a bill at the end of the month, smart meters will allow consumers to monitor their consumption in real-time, according to Megan Wright, spokeswoman for Oncor.

“Advanced metering is like putting a speedometer on your electric bill,” Wright said. In a house with a smart meter interacting with the smart grid, a consumer could turn on a blender, for example, and use in-home monitors to see immediately how their energy consumption increases.

Aside from savings which arise through better-educated consumption, consumers could elect to operate certain appliances away from peak hours, meaning electric companies would bill them less. In addition, the smart grid gives electric service providers faster response times when repairing damages on the grid.

“The smart grid enables Oncor to find and pinpoint problems on the grid before anyone calls and reports them,” Wright said. “So if there’s an outage, we’ll have a much faster response time.”

But the smart grid has been subject to controversy, especially because of the detailed consumer information it collects and pushes back to service providers.

Roy Hadley, an attorney with the Atlanta law office of Barnes & Thornburg and co-leader of the cloud computing and cyber-security practice team, said the technology will give electric service providers granular information on consumers, data that electric companies have never dealt with before.

“This data could potentially be a marketing gold mine,” Hadley said.

As smart meters become more in-tune with consumers and their usage habits, and as they gain the ability to interact with appliances within the house, information in greater detail will travel back over the smart grid infrastructure to the power companies.

“Eventually you do have the ability as a power company to really talk about and capture my usage,” Hadley said. “So all of a sudden, they know when I’m home and not home. Do I really want them to know that?”

The scenario becomes similar to the online marketing information economy, where Web sites and applications gather consumer data and sell it en masse to marketing companies.

Say, for example, your power company was able to observe in its data that every first week of July you leave your house, Hadley explained. Year after year, your power usage suddenly declines for a week. Your power company could then take that data, assume you were going on vacation, and sell it to travel companies that are interested in targeting potential vacationers with ads.

“The power companies collect this information, and the question becomes: whose information is it?” Hadley said. “Is it their information to sell? Is it their information to protect?”

Whenever detailed information is collected in cyberspace, the question of security is usually soon to follow. A recent survey from Ponemon Research found that 90 percent of U.S. businesses were victims of hacking in the past 12 months. With all that data going into the smart grid, data that reveals intimate information about when a person is home, the specter of hackers using their skills to burglarize homes emerges.

“If I’m a burglar, for example, all I’ve got to do is hack into the smart grid, and I know when you’re home and when you’re not home,” Hadley said.

Despite these concerns, Hadley said the technology and the types of information collected are so new that there is no federal legislation to protect consumers. What happens to consumers’ data when it goes into the smart grid is left to the discretion of individual companies, or else to individual states.

According to Wright, Oncor, which distributes electricity to about 400 cities in Texas, has no plans to sell consumers’ information for marketing purposes. In addition, Texas law stipulates that all utility data belongs to the consumers, and it therefore prohibits a company like Oncor from using that data for purposes other than billing, according to Wright.

Wright added that Oncor uses a fully encrypted security system, so any information accessed by hackers would have to be decoded.

“The information is very safe and secure–it’s fully encrypted,” she said. “It’s impossible to design an impenetrable security system, but we have a multi-layered approach that’s overseen by several offices.”

Oncor has a full-time security team that is constantly monitoring and addressing each security alert, according to Wright. If there are irregularities, the team investigates them. If a problem were to arise, the team would take measures to lock it out of the system.

Oncor has teamed up with CenterPoint Energy to start the Biggest Energy Saver Campaign, a contest that is part of the Obama Administration’s push to educate citizens about the smart grid. The event centers around two contests: an app developers contest, which encourages developers to create consumer-facing smart grid apps; and a customer contest, which will reward customers who use smart meters to reduce their energy consumption.

For details on the competitions and the prizes visit the site here.

 

 

Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest
RobertWilliams 5 pts

SMART METERS LINKED TO CANCER.

Utilities and Health Departments based previous safety claims on World Health Organization (WHO).

But June 2011, WHO says Wireless Smart Meter radiation is linked to CANCER (possible human carcinogen – same as Lead, DDT, etc), and that means it also damages bodies & brains (including children’s) in many ways, other than cancer.

1. WIRELESS SMART METERS – 100 TIMES MORE RADIATION THAN CELL PHONES. Video Interview: Nuclear Scientist, Daniel Hirsch, (5 minutes). http://stopsmartmeters.org/2011/04/20/daniel-hirsch-on-ccsts-fuzzy-math/

2. WIRELESS SMART METERS – CANCER, NERVOUS SYSTEM DAMAGE, ADVERSE REPRODUCTION AFFECTS. Video Interview: Dr. Carpenter, New York Public Health Department, Dean of Public Health, (2 minutes). http://emfsafetynetwork.org/?p=3946

3. THE KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE IN STOCKHOLM (the University that gives the Nobel Prizes) ISSUES GLOBAL HEALTH WARNING AGAINST WIRELESS SMART METERS. 2-page Press Release: http://www.scribd.com/doc/48148346/Karolinska-Institute-Press-Release

CatherineCuellar 6 pts

RobertWilliams Actually the "possible human carcinogen" designation from WHO is comparable to talc (aka baby powder) and peroxide — not at all the same.

RobertWilliams 5 pts

CatherineCuellar Catherine,

Legitimate highly qualified and INDEPENDENT laboratory scientists have tested the non-ionizing radiation coming from the Wireless smart meters. They have tested it in amounts considerably less than coming from the wireless meters and they see (1) Cell damage, (2) DNA Chain Breaks and (3) Breaches in the Blood - Brain Barrier. This is a fact.

How long it takes for other institutions to acknowledge, admit, etc that these things are truly damaging (cigarettes took over 70 years once independent scientists tested them and knew they were damaging) is another story. But for one's own family and friends, it is best to face the truth rather than our organizations that generally get it correct, but decades later.

Not everything bad needs to be prohibited, but Mandatory installation of Wireless meters is now unacceptable given the damage they impose and community RF is similar to 2nd hand smoke.

Though being on your side AT THIS TIME is easier because it is still difficult outside the laboratory to isolate and prove the damage to people coming from the Wireless meters just as it was difficult to prove the damage from cigarettes for so long and still is.

CatherineCuellar 6 pts

RobertWilliams While I disagree with your interpretation of smart meters' WHO status, I share your concern about public safety. Healthy H2O & air is important to me & real time info from http://SmartMeterTexas.com helped me reduce my energy use, lowering emissions from power plants.

RobertWilliams 5 pts

MISREPRESENTATIONS OF WIRELESS SMART METERS.

1. The utility information generated by Wireless smart meters is NOT real-time and it is NOT formatted for customer use so it does NOT assist customers to use less energy or lower their utility bills. The information only assists the Utility Company to bill customers and shut off customer power remotely.

2. In countries where Wireless smart meters are being installed, energy use is NOT decreasing, customer UTILITY BILLS ARE INCREASING, there are problems with SECURITY, HACKING, ELECTRICAL FIRES & ELECTRICAL INTERFERENCE.

3. The Utility companies are salivating over eliminating the jobs of the full-time-with-benefit meter reader employees and replacing them with phone operators in India and the Philippines who read scripts to customers over the phone for $4 per day with-NO-Benefits. And the savings are NOT passed on to customers.

4. Wireless smart meters are NOT mandated by the US Federal Energy Program, as California’s PG$E pretends. 5. 42 Cities & Counties in California have taken positions AGAINST Wireless smart meters and 13 have passed Ordinances prohibiting Wireless meter installation.

ALSO: every appliance has or will have its own electronic signature, so yes, Wireless smart meters will give your exact activity information to the utility company and the government will have access to every move you make in your home. Existing analog meters only provide total usage and therefore protect your privacy.

High-tech home robbers (and HIGH-TECH CHILD MOLESTERS) will also hack this information and know exactly your habits and when you are not home (and WHEN YOUR CHILDREN ARE HOME).

MISREPRESENTATIONS OF WIRELESS SMART METERS.

CatherineCuellar 6 pts

RobertWilliams Please consider the facts @ieeespectrum http://spectrum.ieee.org/at-work/innovation/saving-smart-meters-from-a-backlash/